background-image: url(image/cover2.jpg) class: top, right, inverse .in25[ ### HTTP Working Group #### IETF 95, Buenos Aires ] --- ### Administrivia * 2 min - Blue sheets / scribe selection / NOTE WELL * 3 min - [Agenda](https://github.com/httpwg/wg-materials/blob/gh-pages/ietf95/agenda.md) bashing --- class: small ### Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made within the context of an IETF activity is considered an "IETF Contribution". Such statements include oral statements in IETF sessions, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, which are addressed to: * The IETF plenary session * The IESG, or any member thereof on behalf of the IESG * Any IETF mailing list, including the IETF list itself, any working group or design team list, or any other list functioning under IETF auspices * Any IETF working group or portion thereof * Any Birds of a Feather (BOF) session * The IAB or any member thereof on behalf of the IAB * The RFC Editor or the Internet-Drafts function * All IETF Contributions are subject to the rules of [RFC 5378](http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5378.txt) and [RFC 3979](http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3979.txt) (updated by [RFC 4879](http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4879.txt)). Statements made outside of an IETF session, mailing list or other function, that are clearly not intended to be input to an IETF activity, group or function, are not IETF Contributions in the context of this notice. Please consult [RFC 5378](http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5378.txt) and [RFC 3979](http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3979.txt) for details. A participant in any IETF activity is deemed to accept all IETF rules of process, as documented in Best Current Practices RFCs and IESG Statements. A participant in any IETF activity acknowledges that written, audio and video records of meetings may be made and may be available to the public. --- ### RFC6265bis *45 minutes* [Overview presentation](cookies.pdf) by Mike West #### RFC6265bis: Adopted Drafts 1. [Leave Secure Cookies Alone](http://httpwg.org/http-extensions/draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-alone.html) 2. [Cookie Prefixes](https://httpwg.github.io/http-extensions/draft-ietf-httpbis-cookie-prefixes.html) #### RFC6265bis: To Discuss 1. [#159: Allow cookies without key or value](https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/159) - _see also [Ivan Nikulin's research](http://inikulin.github.io/cookie-compat/)_ 2. [Cookie Priorities](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-west-cookie-priority-00) 3. [Same-Site Cookies](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-west-first-party-cookies) 4. Cookie Lifetimes --- ### Potential Work II *balance of time* Discuss possible [future work items](https://github.com/httpwg/wiki/wiki/WatchList), including: * [TCP Tuning for HTTP](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-stenberg-httpbis-tcp) - *[presentation](tcp.pdf) by Tim Wicinski* * [Client Certificates](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-http2-client-certs) - *[presentation](client_certs.pdf) by Martin Thomson* * [Secondary Server-Certificate Authentication in HTTP/2](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bishop-httpbis-http2-additional-certs) - *[presentation](server_certs.pdf) by Mike Bishop* * [Cache Digests](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kazuho-h2-cache-digest/) - *[presentation](digest.pdf) by Kazuho Oku* * [Decomposing the Hypertext Transfer Protocol](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bishop-httpbis-decomposing-http) - *[presentation](disentangle.pdf) by Mike Bishop* * [Merkle Integrity Content Encoding](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-http-mice/) - *[presentation](MICE.pdf) by Martin Thomson* * [Secure Content Delegation using HTTP](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-http-scd/) and [Caching Secure HTTP Content using Blind Caches](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thomson-http-bc/) - *[presentation](BC.pdf) by Martin Thomson*